º» ¿¬±¸´Â Á·»ï¸®¡¤»ç°üÀÇ Áö¾ÐºÀ ¾È¾ÐÀÌ Çзɱ⠾Ƶ¿ÀÇ ½Äü Áõ»ó ¿ÏÈ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú¸¦ °ËÁ¤ÇÏ¿©, Çб³ÇöÀå¿¡¼ È°¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÑÀÇÇÐÀû °£È£ÁßÀ縦 °³¹ßÇÏ°íÀÚ ½ÃµµÇÑ ºñµ¿µî¼º ´ëÁ¶±º ÀüÈÄ À¯»ç ½ÇÇè¼³°è ¿¬±¸ÀÌ´Ù. ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀº 2003³â 4¿ù 1ÀϺÎÅÍ 5¿ù 30ÀϱîÁö ¿ï»ê±¤¿ª½Ã¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇÑ D, M, N ÃʵîÇб³¿¡¼ ½Äü Áõ»óÀ¸·Î º¸°Ç½ÇÀ» ¹æ¹®ÇÑ ¾Æµ¿ Áß D ÃʵîÇб³ ¾Æµ¿ 35¸íÀº ½ÇÇ豺, M, N ÃʵîÇб³ ¾Æµ¿ 35¸íÀº ´ëÁ¶±ºÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
½ÇÇ豺°ú ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡°Ô »çÀüÁ¶»ç·Î ½Äü Áõ»óÀ» »çÀüÇÑ ÈÄ ½ÇÇèóġ·Î ½ÇÇ豺¿¡°Ô´Â Áö¾ÐºÀÀ¸·Î Á·»ï¸®¡¤»ç°üÀ» °ÀÚ±ØÀ¸·Î 1ºÐ°£ 3ȸ¾¿(20ÃÊ¿¡ 1ȸ) ¾È¾ÐÇÏ¿´°í, ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡°Ô´Â Åë»óÀûÀ¸·Î ½ÃÇàÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â °£È£ÁßÀç·Î ¼ÒÈÁ¦(ÈѽºÅ» Ç÷¯½º 1T~800§·)¸¦ Åõ¿©ÇÏ¿´´Ù. »çÈÄÁ¶»ç·Î ½ÇÇ豺°ú ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡°Ô ½Äü ôµµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 3ȸ(40ºÐ, 80ºÐ, 120ºÐ ÈÄ)¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ½Äü Áõ»óÀ» »çÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼ »ç¿ëÇÑ ½Äü ôµµ´Â ´ëÇѼÒÈ°ü¿îµ¿ÇÐȸ¿¡¼ äÅÃÇÑ ±â´É¼º À§Àå°ü Àå¾ÖÀÇ Áø´Ü±âÁØÀÎ ·Î¸¶±âÁØ¥±(ÃÖ¸í±Ô, ÇѼ®¿ø, 2999; ÃÖ¸í±Ô, 2000)¸¦ ÇÑÀÇÇÐÀû »çÁ¤ ±âÁØ¿¡ Àû¿ë½ÃŲ ÈÄ ÇÑÀÇ»ç 2Àΰú °£È£Çб³¼ö 2ÀÎÀÇ ÀÚ¹®À» ¹Þ¾Æ ½Äü Áõ»ó ôµµ¸¦ ¿Ï¼ºÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¿¬±¸µµ±¸ÀÇ ½Å·Úµµ´Â Chronbach¢¥s ¥á=0.87À̾ú´Ù. ½Äü ôµµ´Â ¢¥¾ó±¼ÀÌ È²¹é»öÀ̰ųª ¹é»öÀÌ´Ù¢¥, ¢¥¸Ô±â¸¦ ½È¾îÇÑ´Ù.¢¥, ¢¥¹è°¡ Æ÷¸¸°¨ÀÌ ÀÖ°í, ´õºÎ·èÇÏ´Ù¢¥,¢¥¸íÄ¡ºÎÀ§°¡ ¾ÆÇÁ´Ù¢¥,¢¥¼ÓÀÌ ¹Ì½Ä°Å¸°´Ù¢¥ÀÇ 5°¡Áö Áõ»óÀÇ À¯¹«·Î ±¸¼ºµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. ¼öÁýµÈ ÀÚ·á´Â SPP 10 WIN ProgramÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½Ç¼ö¿Í ¹éºÐÀ², x©÷-test¿Í independent t-test·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú´Â ½ÇÇèóġ ÈÄ ½Äü Áõ»óÀÌ 40ºÐ ÈÄ¿¡´Â ½ÇÇ豺Àº Æò±Õ 2.89Á¡ÀÌ°í, ´ëÁ¶±ºÀº Æò±Õ 3.83Á¡À¸·Î µÎ ±º°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ(t=6.317, p=0.000) ¸¦ º¸¿´°í, 80ºÐ ÈÄ¿¡´Â ½ÇÇ豺Àº Æò±Õ 1.97Á¡, ´ëÁ¶±ºÀº Æò±Õ 3.39Á¡À¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ(t=10.653, p=0.000)¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, 120ºÐ ÈÄ¿¡´Â ½ÇÇ豺Àº Æò±Õ 1.26Á¡, ´ëÁ¶±ºÀº Æò±Õ 2.83Á¡À¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ(t=11.648, p=0.000)¸¦ º¸¿© °¡¼³ÀÌ ÁöÁöµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î º¼ ¶§, Á·»ï¸®¡¤»ç°üÀÇ Áö¾ÐºÀ ¾È¾ÐÀÌ Çзɱ⠾Ƶ¿ÀÇ ½Äü Áõ»ó ¿ÏÈ¿¡ È¿°úÀûÀÓÀÌ ÀÔÁõµÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸°á°ú¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÏ¿© Á·»ï¸®¡¤»ç°üÀÇ Áö¾ÐºÀ ¾È¾ÐÀÌ Çб³ÇöÀå¿¡¼ º¸°Ç±³»ç°¡ µ¶ÀÚÀûÀ¸·Î ½ÃÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °£È£ÁßÀç¹ýÀ¸·Î °è½ï È°¿ëµÇ±â¸¦ ¹Ù¶ó¸ç ´ë»óÀÚ¸¦ È®´ëÇÏ¿© Á·»ï¸®¡¤»ç°üÀÇ Áö¾ÐºÀ ¾È¾ÐÀÌ ½Äü Áõ»ó ¿Ï·Ö È¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Ýº¹¿¬±¸ÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù.
Objectives : The purpose of this study was to identify the relationships between the maternal burden of caretaking and the child-rearing attitude of the infants¢¥ mothers.
Methods : The subjects were 117 mothers of infants who had visited a public health center during the period of July 1st to 30th in 2003. Han¢¥s the Burden of Caretaking Scale and Coiher¢¥s Maternal Attitude Scale were used.
Results :The results of this study were as follows;
The mean score of the maternal burden of caretaking and the child-rearing attitude were 21.7, 63.1 respectively. The maternal burden of caretaking was significantly related with infant birth order (p < 0.05), and the child-rearing attitude was significantly related with infant¢¥s. age (p < 0.10) . There were significant relationships between the caretaking burden and the child-rearing attitude of the infants¢¥ mothers when the effects of maternal education, economic state, number of children, intention to pregnancy and presence of rearing-supporter were controlled(r=-0.318, p < 0.001).
Conclusions : In conclusion, as maternal burden of caretaking was stronger, the subject¢¥s child-rearing attitude was more negative.
|